News:

Reminder to all members: please keep thread discussions 'on-topic' - this is a structured discussion forum, not a general 'group chat'!

Main Menu

Birmingham Central Garage

Started by Liverpool Street, July 01, 2013, 05:31:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mike K

Quote from: 2206 on July 30, 2018, 02:29:11 PM
This confirms the Harborne Branding is incomplete then:

Dammit. It's nice having light coming in through the back windows.

Kevin

Quote from: Mike K on July 30, 2018, 03:19:12 PM
Dammit. It's nice having light coming in through the back windows.

Le sigh. Agreed, it makes the buses less claustrophobic
Now in exile in Oxfordshire....
 

MasterPlan

Probably a controversial opinion here but I think the branding looks better with the halo and the back done. Just looks half-arsed like this.
Local Routes: 002, 39/39A, X21, 46, 76.
Localish Routes: 18, 23, X22.

RW

Vinyl vandals about to strike again then. Back to travelling in a claustrophobic box! Will NXWM never learn that passengers like to have bright interiors and unobstructed views when using public transport? Perhaps this is something else TfWM should have a look at.

Mike K

#4639
Quote from: 2206 on July 30, 2018, 12:03:07 PM
6885, 6887 and 6886.
As they're towards the end of the 2017 batch I wander if they're being branded for the Harbornes or if the X20/X22 is going to get branded? Would these be for the X20/X22?
Not sure what the PVR's are but would 30 buses be needed for the Harbornes (6858 - 6887)?

Well 6885 never got done. It's on the 22 this afternoon and whilst it has the black window surrounds, it's not branded.

Edit - on the 23, not the 22 which is sadly no more.

Mike K

Quote from: RW on July 30, 2018, 05:38:02 PM
Vinyl vandals about to strike again then. Back to travelling in a claustrophobic box! Will NXWM never learn that passengers like to have bright interiors and unobstructed views when using public transport? Perhaps this is something else TfWM should have a look at.

To be fair it's not just NXWM - lots of branding - Transdev, Go North East and plenty of other recent examples have one or both rear windows covered. I've no objection to branding at all, I just don't see why thy can't have branding / route promotion on the rear without completely obscuring the windows. The latest Harborne / QE brandings are a bit simpler than some of the others so fingers crossed the rear windows are left alone (but I'm not holding my breath).

MasterPlan

#4641
On 2142 this morning I noticed there doesn't seem to be a University Hop sticker on the side anymore. What's happened to that? Or is it just 2142?

EDIT:Same with 2126 and a couple of other B7RLEs I saw.
Local Routes: 002, 39/39A, X21, 46, 76.
Localish Routes: 18, 23, X22.

Nxwm

@Tony do you have any idea what buses are going to operate on the 501 cricket shuttles tomorrow?

Mike K

#4643
Quote from: Dylanbusboy45 on July 30, 2018, 12:27:28 PM
I wonder what will happen to 6835-40, I would have thought they would have been the X20 branded buses but as they are all getting the same branding obviously not. Maybe the rest of the 688x and 689x as well as the 683x will be done

I'm wondering whether 6835-40 might receive generic branding as spares for all the BC platinum routes. They look a bit of a mess with the X61 branding removed and the plainer Harborne and QE brandings, which look like they'll be applied to most of the 67 plates, wouldn't cover the marks left by the old X61 vinyls.

Dylanbusboy45

Quote from: Mike K on July 31, 2018, 05:52:44 PM
I'm wandering whether 6835-40 might receive generic branding as spares for all the BC platinum routes. They look a bit of a mess with the X61 branding removed and the plainer Harborne and QE brandings, which look like they'll be applied to most of the 67 plates, wouldn't cover the marks left by the old X61 vinyls.

Yes they probably will. I agree, they do look a mess having been debranded, generic platinum branding should cover it up nicely

CL

Apologies for being a nuisance, but does anybody have a definitive list of the branded 67-reg examples to date?

I know it's scattered over several threads, though I can't seem to make heads or tails of anything. Again, sorry, but thanks in advance.
Check out my photos on Flickr & Instagram

"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."

Mike K

Quote from: CL on August 03, 2018, 09:09:15 AM
Apologies for being a nuisance, but does anybody have a definitive list of the branded 67-reg examples to date?

I know it's scattered over several threads, though I can't seem to make heads or tails of anything. Again, sorry, but thanks in advance.

From what I've seen and what's been posted so far, 6858-6879 are Harborne 23/24 branded (6872 had been missed, not sure if that's done now) and it's been reported that several between and including 6880 and 6889 are QE X20/X21/X22 branded.

V89MOA

Quote from: Mike K on August 03, 2018, 09:27:14 AM
From what I've seen and what's been posted so far, 6858-6879 are Harborne 23/24 branded (6872 had been missed, not sure if that's done now) and it's been reported that several between and including 6880 and 6889 are QE X20/X21/X22 branded.
6872 has been done now.

CL

#4648
Thanks @Mike K @V89MOA

It appears that @Tony may have accidentally put the latest photo of 6889 on 6869's page. Caused me a little confusion. ;)
Check out my photos on Flickr & Instagram

"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."

MasterPlan

Quote from: John on August 03, 2018, 05:26:43 PM
There are 2 B7RLEs on there. One on the 61 and one on the 63. They don't interwork

How come the 61/63 doesn't interwork this time around? Is the case with others too? Do the 23/24 interwork?
Local Routes: 002, 39/39A, X21, 46, 76.
Localish Routes: 18, 23, X22.

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk