News:

Please do have a browse through the forums or use the Search functionality before posting a new topic - chances are there is already a discussion underway on that subject, or your question has already been answered previously!

Main Menu

NXWM Changes 24/07/16

Started by Stuharris 6360, May 31, 2016, 01:12:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

andy41

Any news on the previous rumour that the 966 is ditching the Erdington end? I see the 38 is revised which may have something to do with this but nothing there on the 966.

What are they doing to cover the deregistered X56? (If anything)

Metroman

Quote from: Stuharris 6360 on May 31, 2016, 09:05:22 PM
@Metroman , Karl says

Colmore row all stops to five ways
First stop Hagley road after five ways under pass
Ivy bush
Portland road
Gillett road
Sandon road
Bearwood after lights
Wolverhampton road
Jeffersons
Quinton.

Sure that is similar to the old X2, 902 Limited stop services between Birmingham & Hasbury

Thank you.

Trident 4609

Quote from: andy41 on June 01, 2016, 05:55:28 PM
Any news on the previous rumour that the 966 is ditching the Erdington end? I see the 38 is revised which may have something to do with this but nothing there on the 966.

What are they doing to cover the deregistered X56? (If anything)

@andy41 an extension on the 937 (i assume a single trip extending)

Steve3229vp

Quote from: Nathan on June 01, 2016, 06:03:22 PM
@andy41 an extension on the 937 (i assume a single trip extending)

wouldn't be easier to extend a 936 journey as it is peak only service !

andy41

Quote from: Nathan on June 01, 2016, 06:03:22 PM
@andy41 an extension on the 937 (i assume a single trip extending)

Thanks. I find the commuter routes around there pretty confusing now compared to what went before.

Westy

Why dont they try running a proper service instead of these peak only journeys?

markcf83

Quote from: Steve3229vp on May 31, 2016, 05:48:39 PM
I agree entirely, the system for 2xx for Dudley/Stourbridge, 3xx for Walsall, 4xx for Sandwell and 5xx for Wolverhampton was a good system

As do I. At least then I knew where I stood.
Don't judge me until you've walked in my size ten shoes.

GeminiFan1991

Quote from: Westy on June 01, 2016, 07:03:06 PM
Why dont they try running a proper service instead of these peak only journeys?

Its a valid point although Im assuming NX would but they dont think the demand is their ?
Please check out my Bus Photos @

https://www.flickr.com/photos/128406405@N06/

monkeyjoe

Looks like the Coventry road services have a route change, could that be connected to Brum city centre changes ?

Michael Bevan

Quote from: Westy on June 01, 2016, 07:03:06 PM
Why dont they try running a proper service instead of these peak only journeys?

I honestly think making the X56 a regular service between Burntwood or Brownhills and Birmingham wouldn't be a bad idea. It's a fast way into Birmingham which I think more people would use if it was a proper service. But I can also see a possible demand for Burntwood as I've seen the 10's load. When I did a round trip on it before I noticed a few people used the 10 to connect to Birmingham bound services.

Mike K

Quote from: Michael Bevan on June 01, 2016, 11:52:58 PM
I honestly think making the X56 a regular service between Burntwood or Brownhills and Birmingham wouldn't be a bad idea. It's a fast way into Birmingham which I think more people would use if it was a proper service. But I can also see a possible demand for Burntwood as I've seen the 10's load. When I did a round trip on it before I noticed a few people used the 10 to connect to Birmingham bound services.

Surely though if the demand was there for an all day service, there would be one. The 155 and before that the 944 provided an all day service between Birmingham and Burntwood / Boney Hay but there hasn't been a daytime service for years now.

Adam 404

PD0001111/38 - WEST MIDLANDS TRAVEL LTD T/A TRAVEL WEST MIDLANDS, 51 BORDESLEY GREEN, BIRMINGHAM, B9 4BZ

Variation Accepted: Operating between Birmingham, City Centre and Hawkesley given service number 35 effective from 24-Jul-2016. To amend Route and Timetable.


PD0001111/47 - WEST MIDLANDS TRAVEL LTD T/A TRAVEL WEST MIDLANDS, 51 BORDESLEY GREEN, BIRMINGHAM, B9 4BZ

Variation Accepted: Operating between Druids Heath and Birmingham, Moor Street given service number 50/50A effective from 24-Jul-2016. To amend Route and Timetable.


PD0001111/70 - WEST MIDLANDS TRAVEL LTD T/A TRAVEL WEST MIDLANDS, 51 BORDESLEY GREEN, BIRMINGHAM, B9 4BZ

Variation Accepted: Operating between Birmingham, Carrs Lane and Maypole, Maypole Lane given service number 2 effective from 24-Jul-2016. To amend Route and Timetable.


PD0001111/403 - WEST MIDLANDS TRAVEL LTD T/A TRAVEL WEST MIDLANDS, 51 BORDESLEY GREEN, BIRMINGHAM, B9 4BZ

Variation Accepted: Operating between Birmingham to Walsall and Birmingham to Walsall given service number 51/X51 effective from 24-Jul-2016. To amend Route and Timetable.


PD0001111/642 - WEST MIDLANDS TRAVEL LTD T/A TRAVEL WEST MIDLANDS, 51 BORDESLEY GREEN, BIRMINGHAM, B9 4BZ

Variation Accepted: Operating between Birmingham, Carrs Lane and Shirley, Green Business Park given service number 3 effective from 24-Jul-2016. To amend Route and Timetable.


PD0001111/648 - WEST MIDLANDS TRAVEL LTD T/A TRAVEL WEST MIDLANDS, 51 BORDESLEY GREEN, BIRMINGHAM, B9 4BZ

Variation Accepted: Operating between Brownhills to Birmingham and Brownhills to Birmingham given service number 934/935/936/937/937A effective from 24-Jul-2016. To amend Route and Timetable.


monkeyjoe

City centre route changes ?

Tony

Most of the lists now seem to have the correct terminal points, so I wonder if someone at DVSA is now correcting them on the system and because terminal points are changed they show as route changes as well as timetable

2206

PD0001111/681 - WEST MIDLANDS TRAVEL LTD T/A TRAVEL WEST MIDLANDS, 51 BORDESLEY GREEN, BIRMINGHAM, B9 4BZ
Variation Accepted: Operating between Birmingham, City Centre and Solihull given service number 31 effective from 24-Jul-2016. To amend Route and Timetable.
Local Routes
94/95, 11A/11C, 28.

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk