News:

Welcome to the WM Buses in Photos Forum! New and existing members are kindly reminded to respect and abide by the Forum Rules that are in place here.

Main Menu

North Birmingham and Sutton Coldfield Review

Started by vinh1000, October 31, 2012, 05:38:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

vinh1000

http://www.networkwestmidlands.com/BusReview/northbirmingahmreview.aspx

Wondering what ideas you had for the review?
I wish they added another bus on my local route (PVR to 6) or cancel the extension which was unnecessary :)


Bob


winston


adam 21

i agree leave  the numbers alone but  they can still  do soming with routes  new routes and other

vinh1000

Quote from: lynx1103 on October 31, 2012, 06:45:59 PM
Bring back the 68A/68C
I agree here several drivers told me they want it back too a good route this! On one of BY's mercs I think it still shows the route 68 route map :)

Gareth

I filled out their questionnaire, I too requested that service numbers not be changed.

I had a horrible image of the 905 becoming yet another number 5! 


winston

Quote from: vinh1000 on October 31, 2012, 08:02:33 PM
Quote from: lynx1103 on October 31, 2012, 06:45:59 PM
Bring back the 68A/68C
I agree here several drivers told me they want it back too a good route this! On one of BY's mercs I think it still shows the route 68 route map :)

Quite a few people still miss the 68A/68C, which begs the question why is was withdrawn if it is so popular

andy

Quote from: Winston on October 31, 2012, 11:48:40 PM
Quote from: vinh1000 on October 31, 2012, 08:02:33 PM
Quote from: lynx1103 on October 31, 2012, 06:45:59 PM
Bring back the 68A/68C
I agree here several drivers told me they want it back too a good route this! On one of BY's mercs I think it still shows the route 68 route map :)

Quite a few people still miss the 68A/68C, which begs the question why is was withdrawn if it is so popular

I've said several times in other threads that its withdrawal was a mistake, it removed several useful links which have only been partially replaced by a variety of cobbled together alterations to other services.

sonic84

Quote from: Gareth on October 31, 2012, 11:20:18 PM
I filled out their questionnaire, I too requested that service numbers not be changed.

I had a horrible image of the 905 becoming yet another number 5!

Or the 51 becoming the 5!

winston

Quote from: sonic84 on November 01, 2012, 12:25:51 AM
Quote from: Gareth on October 31, 2012, 11:20:18 PM
I filled out their questionnaire, I too requested that service numbers not be changed.

I had a horrible image of the 905 becoming yet another number 5!

Or the 51 becoming the 5!

Unlikely, as you already have the 5 from B'Ham - Solihull

adam 21

i agree bring back the 68a and 68c but do not run it in to the fort also they should bring back the 28a from castle vale to perry barr and what about withdrawing the 997e jounrys to the pheasy and replacing them with something like a 996 to sutton coldfield via perry barr ,old ocsott, pheasy , kingstanding , streelty and then on to sutton

Bob

Seriously they should extend more X51s to & from Cannôck advertise it and theyll get the cannock -walsall custom too

Nathan4775

I''d Say
934 - Goes back to Every 30 minutes Evening
935A- Operates 30 minute frequency Evenings
997E - Extended to Aldridge or just Extended all journeys to Walsall
My Flickr;
http://www.flickr.com/photos/90949252@N04/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
4775, 4770, 4697, 4698 , 4141, 4444, 4555

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk