News:

Reminder to all members: please keep thread discussions 'on-topic' - this is a structured discussion forum, not a general 'group chat'!

Main Menu

Unusual workings-May 2013

Started by Dylan4579, May 01, 2013, 07:51:03 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ashley 4569


Ash

4137 on the 301
1882 on the 302

I have saw at least 1881/2/1895 are some omnilinks to have the new NXWM fleetnames applied from the temporary ones they had when first new and the changeover was only just occurring.

Trident 4609

Quote from: Ashley 4569 on May 13, 2013, 03:13:01 PM
4019 - 1

I've found that Tridents and Spectras are appearing on the 1.Look at Yesterday The 1 was fully trident operated

Westy

Quote from: Ash on May 13, 2013, 03:35:18 PM
4137 on the 301
1882 on the 302

I have saw at least 1881/2/1895 are some omnilinks to have the new NXWM fleetnames applied from the temporary ones they had when first new and the changeover was only just occurring.

That is something thats puzzled me.

Why paint in the new livery but still have the temporary fleetnames?


nitromatt1

Quote from: Winston on May 13, 2013, 01:20:24 PM
Quote from: Rob4367 on May 13, 2013, 01:15:25 PM
1633 > 141 (is this unusual)

Yes, its normally Enviro 400's or B7RLE

Blimey! Is that on all daytime or a peak working?

ilovetea4370

Quote from: Westy on May 13, 2013, 05:07:13 PM
Quote from: Ash on May 13, 2013, 03:35:18 PM
4137 on the 301
1882 on the 302

I have saw at least 1881/2/1895 are some omnilinks to have the new NXWM fleetnames applied from the temporary ones they had when first new and the changeover was only just occurring.

That is something thats puzzled me.

Why paint in the new livery but still have the temporary fleetnames?

Yardley Wood also seem to be replacing their temporary logos with new ones, it is quite noticeable on the b10l's!

CL

Check out my photos on Flickr & Instagram

winston

Quote from: trident4370 on May 13, 2013, 05:30:47 PM
Quote from: Westy on May 13, 2013, 05:07:13 PM
Quote from: Ash on May 13, 2013, 03:35:18 PM
4137 on the 301
1882 on the 302

I have saw at least 1881/2/1895 are some omnilinks to have the new NXWM fleetnames applied from the temporary ones they had when first new and the changeover was only just occurring.

That is something thats puzzled me.

Why paint in the new livery but still have the temporary fleetnames?

Yardley Wood also seem to be replacing their temporary logos with new ones, it is quite noticeable on the b10l's!

Not before time, NX seem to have a little purge every now & then and then is stops again. The most recent being all of BY's fleet receiving NXWM fleetnames on TWM livery

Dylan4579

#233
Quote from: clayderman on May 13, 2013, 05:36:07 PM
2105 on the 11C!  ??? :o
Keep your hair on it's only just unsusal
.

nitromatt1

Quote from: dgss1 on May 13, 2013, 06:23:57 PM
Quote from: clayderman on May 13, 2013, 05:36:07 PM
2105 on the 11C!  ??? :o
Keep your hair on it's only just unsusal

Was going to say, that's not extremely rare, although I have never seen one

Trident 4609

Not very unusual but

4549 and 4543 on WN 25
4004 And 4020 on WN 28

nitromatt1

1633 is on an all day/night running board of the 141 today.

Trident 4609

Quote from: nitromatt1 on May 13, 2013, 06:57:38 PM
1633 is on an all day/night running board of the 141 today.

How many Non-Compliant buses from NXWM actually enter Birmingham City Centre? You would think there wasn't a emmisions zone however come to think of it The 141 is every 30 mins isn't it so would be allowed wouldn't it?

nitromatt1

Quote from: Trident 4609 on May 13, 2013, 07:01:14 PM
Quote from: nitromatt1 on May 13, 2013, 06:57:38 PM
1633 is on an all day/night running board of the 141 today.

How many Non-Compliant buses from NXWM actually enter Birmingham City Centre? You would think there wasn't a emmisions zone however come to think of it The 141 is every 30 mins isn't it so would be allowed wouldn't it?

Yes Pensnett have been putting Mercs on the 140, 120 and now 141 lately. All of which are frequent enough to fall under the emissions rules.

Stu

Quote from: nitromatt1 on May 13, 2013, 07:02:38 PM
Quote from: Trident 4609 on May 13, 2013, 07:01:14 PM
Quote from: nitromatt1 on May 13, 2013, 06:57:38 PM
1633 is on an all day/night running board of the 141 today.

How many Non-Compliant buses from NXWM actually enter Birmingham City Centre? You would think there wasn't a emmisions zone however come to think of it The 141 is every 30 mins isn't it so would be allowed wouldn't it?

Yes Pensnett have been putting Mercs on the 140, 120 and now 141 lately. All of which are frequent enough to fall under the emissions rules.

Actually, Mercs would be allowed on the 141 no problem, as the frequency is every 30 mins (2 buses per hour). The emissions ruling applies only to routes with 3 or more buses per hour (every 20mins or less). Thinking about it, Mercs would be fine on the 140 too, as that is every 30 mins during the daytime, with the exception of peak times, when there are extra buses added, so the frequency increases slightly.
My locals:
2 - Birmingham to Maypole | 3 - Birmingham to Yardley Wood
11A/C - Birmingham Outer Circle | 27 - Yardley Wood to Frankley
76 - Solihull to Northfield | 169 - Solihull to Kings Heath

West Midlands Bus Users: Website | Facebook | Twitter

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk