News:

Reminder to all members: please keep thread discussions 'on-topic' - this is a structured discussion forum, not a general 'group chat'!

Main Menu

West midlands bus franchising

Started by Coventrybususer95, February 09, 2023, 06:28:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

wembley86

Quote from: TGZac on July 31, 2024, 11:59:07 PMAlso the 40

40 was better when diamond and nx had their own 12 minute timetable meaning buses where every 6 minutes.   

wembley86

Quote from: BlackCountryBusSpotter on January 16, 2025, 01:33:34 PMAnd the cars that take them to Work and the respective other staff who work at the Garages, Hospitals and so on
According to government stats for 2022 79% of population drives. In the 1990s it was roughly 65%.

We don't know what it will be like in 2030 but it could be 83%.


Stu

Just been reading through some of the responses to the consultation here:
https://busreform.commonplace.is/en-GB/contributions/proposal/short-questionnaire

Seems to be a lot of contributions "Pending Moderation", including my own!

You cannot view this attachment.
:undecided:
My locals:
2 - Birmingham to Maypole | 3 - Birmingham to Yardley Wood
11A/C - Birmingham Outer Circle | 27 - Yardley Wood to Frankley
76 - Solihull to Northfield | 169 - Solihull to Kings Heath

West Midlands Bus Users: Website | Facebook | X/Twitter | Bluesky

Gareth

Reading people's replies there's a lot of recurring themes. Mainly profit and monopoly.
Without profit there will be zero investment.
Franchising won't give you a choice either, you'll have one company and one company only running your route.

Mentions of the outer circle returning to a circle. That'll probably be one of the first routes to be broken up even further. Bringing back the midland red name was another response.

Franchising will almost certainly happen because so many people are giving positive thoughts about it without fully understanding it. Even I have difficulty understanding a lot of the proposal document and I have a greater understanding of local public transport than many.

BlackCountryBusSpotter

Quote from: Gareth on January 17, 2025, 10:41:14 AMReading people's replies there's a lot of recurring themes. Mainly profit and monopoly.
Without profit there will be zero investment.
Franchising won't give you a choice either, you'll have one company and one company only running your route.

Mentions of the outer circle returning to a circle. That'll probably be one of the first routes to be broken up even further. Bringing back the midland red name was another response.

Franchising will almost certainly happen because so many people are giving positive thoughts about it without fully understanding it. Even I have difficulty understanding a lot of the proposal document and I have a greater understanding of local public transport than many.
My Dad once said you could get a monkey to run for labour and people would still vote for it, I would how many of these people actually use Buses regularly or are young or smart enough to know how it works, so Young, involved in someway in Government or Transport Industry, Financial or been involved in Buses somehow, I bet it wouldn't be a high percentage
Local Routes
NXWM 34, 37, 39, 79
DIA 310
WCT 65
Bit Further Away
NXWM 529, 25, 41, 11, 11A, 40, 47
DIA 326, 57, 23, 41A,
Frequently Travelled On Routes
79, 34/37, 39 and Very Occasionally the 529 and 74

Gareth

Quote from: BlackCountryBusSpotter on January 17, 2025, 11:00:04 AMMy Dad once said you could get a monkey to run for labour and people would still vote for it, I would how many of these people actually use Buses regularly or are young or smart enough to know how it works, so Young, involved in someway in Government or Transport Industry, Financial or been involved in Buses somehow, I bet it wouldn't be a high percentage
I've got nothing against labour and normally I've got nothing against their policies. But I don't agree from what I know so far about West Midlands franchising.
The same on the other side of the argument, I despise what we put up with for the last 14 years, but I didn't mind Andy Street as mayor.

BlackCountryBusSpotter

Quote from: Gareth on January 17, 2025, 11:21:27 AMI've got nothing against labour and normally I've got nothing against their policies. But I don't agree from what I know so far about West Midlands franchising.
The same on the other side of the argument, I despise what we put up with for the last 14 years, but I didn't mind Andy Street as mayor.
I agree there, I only hated his Tram policy
Local Routes
NXWM 34, 37, 39, 79
DIA 310
WCT 65
Bit Further Away
NXWM 529, 25, 41, 11, 11A, 40, 47
DIA 326, 57, 23, 41A,
Frequently Travelled On Routes
79, 34/37, 39 and Very Occasionally the 529 and 74

don

Reading the article in the February 2025 issue of Buses Magazine, something that jumped out at me was YMCA is stating 2039 for full zero emission operation - am I missing something here - I thought NXWM had given an undertaking to be 100% zero emission by 2030 - so why the extra 9 years?

Also, the article mentions the routes operated in the Coventry scheme, by Stagecoach, are exempt from franchising till 2035 - however the NXWM operation In Coventry appears not to be. This seems strange??!! 
Bustimes.org - armchair bus chasing at its best
wmbusphotos.com - armchair bus spotting and news at its best.

Coventrybususer95

Quote from: don on January 18, 2025, 08:01:32 PMReading the article in the February 2025 issue of Buses Magazine, something that jumped out at me was YMCA is stating 2039 for full zero emission operation - am I missing something here - I thought NXWM had given an undertaking to be 100% zero emission by 2030 - so why the extra 9 years?

Also, the article mentions the routes operated in the Coventry scheme, by Stagecoach, are exempt from franchising till 2035 - however the NXWM operation In Coventry appears not to be. This seems strange??!!
Wonder if some backhanders have been past about regarding the stagecoach routes 😒 as it seems a bit unfair that one company can keep routes yet another is at Risk of losing all there's 
All views are my own and does not represent the views of any company/ business that i maybe be working with

the trainbasher

QuoteWonder if some backhanders have been past about regarding the stagecoach routes 😒 as it seems a bit unfair that one company can keep routes yet another is at Risk of losing all there's
Unless they're waiting to see if Warks takes advantage of the forthcoming powers


All opinions and onions mentioned on here are mine and not those of any employer, current, past, present or future, or presented as fact, unless I prove it otherwise.

Stu

Quote from: don on January 18, 2025, 08:01:32 PMReading the article in the February 2025 issue of Buses Magazine, something that jumped out at me was YMCA is stating 2039 for full zero emission operation - am I missing something here - I thought NXWM had given an undertaking to be 100% zero emission by 2030 - so why the extra 9 years?

NX Bus' aim was to have a zero-emission fleet by 2030, that is correct. I do recall reading in the Enhanced Partnership document that TfWM was targetting all operators that all new buses introduced from 2030 should be zero-emission.

Quote from: don on January 18, 2025, 08:01:32 PMAlso, the article mentions the routes operated in the Coventry scheme, by Stagecoach, are exempt from franchising till 2035 - however the NXWM operation In Coventry appears not to be. This seems strange??!! 
Having read through the consultation documents, my understanding is that 'cross-border' services may not be included in the franchise programme, however they would be subject to a 'permit' to operate within the franchised area, rather than being exempted.

My locals:
2 - Birmingham to Maypole | 3 - Birmingham to Yardley Wood
11A/C - Birmingham Outer Circle | 27 - Yardley Wood to Frankley
76 - Solihull to Northfield | 169 - Solihull to Kings Heath

West Midlands Bus Users: Website | Facebook | X/Twitter | Bluesky

cardew

Quote from: don on January 18, 2025, 08:01:32 PMReading the article in the February 2025 issue of Buses Magazine, something that jumped out at me was YMCA is stating 2039 for full zero emission operation - am I missing something here - I thought NXWM had given an undertaking to be 100% zero emission by 2030 - so why the extra 9 years?


As per my post #134 in this thread, see section 3.5.1 on page 227 of the franchising report. I an wary of posting the text on here because there could be two sides to the story.

Coventrybususer95

It seems TFWM plan to spend £6.5 million pound on building a new Coventry bus depot 

Site will be brought in 2025/26 to be open in 2027/28 with a PVR of 40 


Going to be interesting to see where it will be 
All views are my own and does not represent the views of any company/ business that i maybe be working with

ellspurs

Probably on one of the industrial estates by Coventry airport. Once they take over NXC's site they'll sell it for ££££££ to developers and cream off the top.

Sandy Lane

Quote from: Coventrybususer95 on January 19, 2025, 11:38:37 AMIt seems TFWM plan to spend £6.5 million pound on building a new Coventry bus depot

Site will be brought in 2025/26 to be open in 2027/28 with a PVR of 40


Going to be interesting to see where it will be
40 seems a small number for Coventry to me? Doesn't NXC have a few more than that?
If it is just 40 then just maybe they are looking at what was the new depot built by TDC (now a truck base) just before they stopped running?

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk