News:

Please do have a browse through the forums or use the Search functionality before posting a new topic - chances are there is already a discussion underway on that subject, or your question has already been answered previously!

Main Menu

Diamond Bus Service Changes 15th April 2023

Started by the trainbasher, February 09, 2023, 08:50:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

j789

Quote from: Budgie on February 12, 2023, 07:42:20 PM@j789 Whilst I agree with what you are saying about central government funding, how do you deal with the big elephants in the room. Namely, whilst NX, Diamond and Chaserider would probably put funding to good use, others would simply increase management bonuses and shareholder payments whilst paying lip service to route improvements/protection they would use to justify said payments.

Secondly, central government interferene. If the political news is to be believed today, central government are restricting pots of monies to councils for certain things unless they agree to the Civil Service policy of how to clear chewing gum from Park Benches. I would not want such micro management of the bus industry, even if it wasn't privatised.

Thirdly if we have private firms receiving public money, the return should be innovation and not less of the same failed routes. I suggested an extension to the 16, @Westy has made some other good suggestions. How do you ensure that so routes such as the 45,  002 and 226 can live on?
Interesting points you make here from my previous comments. I'd suggest any subsidy should come with stringent conditions that the current level of service must be maintained as a minimum. 

The subsidy would cover the running costs to make the service break even, not necessarily profitable, eg the company would not lose money operating the service but may not make much of a profit either. This is a 'halfway house' solution that operators would need to accept. Share holders probably wouldn't be in favour be for 'the greater good' I'd hope most operators would see the short term need for this over the next few years.

No company is perfect but it would be an easy system to police from s government perspective. Paying a set amount per service would ensure any private company profiteering was kept to a minimum whilst at the same time helping those same companies not have to have so much commercial risk in their operations- that is a win win situation in my eyes compared to the alternative of doing nothing except hiking fares and withdrawing services. 


Westy

I have shared Stu's article from his website onto the Walsall Chit Chat & Natter Facebook page & so far predictably the comments have been along the lines of 'Surprised' & 'We need a bus on the Yew Tree' !


Westy

#62
@Stu - Do you think we need a split off, at this point? Post 1817 would be a good place to start.

j789

Quote from: Stu on February 12, 2023, 07:33:51 PMI'm not suggesting there should be any 'massive' increase in fares, but a realistic 'modest' increase might help matters.
During the Covid pandemic, the government did its level best to discourage and dissuade people from using buses because they were 'unsafe' and that people "might die".
That kind of messaging is quite damaging, admittedly, however I don't think increased subsidies are any kind of viable long-term solution, and while the Government is partly responsible for this mess, I don't think that using public taxpayers money to support private commercial enterprise is a good viable long-term solution.
That messaging put out during COVID is the exact(!!!) reason why the government should put these subsidies in place. Even the service decreases in 1986 caused by de-regulation didn't have the same negative impact as what has happened since 2020. The government owes this industry big time.

All the criticism of NX, Diamond, etc for withdrawing services should be redirected to the politicians who created this situation - they could have handled things so much better and without the negatives now associated with bus (and to a lesser extent train) travel. Those passengers may well be lost forever despite what innovations operators try.

I know it doesn't sit well with some people bailing out private companies, but I think the context those companies operate in needs to be fairly weighed up. The bus industry is in trouble and it is only with public financial help that things can at least start to get back on track.

Justin Tyme

Quote from: j789 on February 12, 2023, 08:37:44 PMInteresting points you make here from my previous comments. I'd suggest any subsidy should come with stringent conditions that the current level of service must be maintained as a minimum.

The subsidy would cover the running costs to make the service break even, not necessarily profitable, eg the company would not lose money operating the service but may not make much of a profit either. This is a 'halfway house' solution that operators would need to accept. Share holders probably wouldn't be in favour be for 'the greater good' I'd hope most operators would see the short term need for this over the next few years.

No company is perfect but it would be an easy system to police from s government perspective. Paying a set amount per service would ensure any private company profiteering was kept to a minimum whilst at the same time helping those same companies not have to have so much commercial risk in their operations- that is a win win situation in my eyes compared to the alternative of doing nothing except hiking fares and withdrawing services.

Am I right in thinking that this is what the Covid Bus Service Support Grant did, and (to a lesser extent) the Bus Recovery Grant is doing until the end of March?

j789

Quote from: Justin Tyme on February 12, 2023, 08:53:30 PMAm I right in thinking that this is what the Covid Bus Service Support Grant did, and (to a lesser extent) the Bus Recovery Grant is doing until the end of March?

Yes pretty much very similar to that idea, it's just that there shouldn't be a 'end' date to it, it should run for as long as necessary for the industry to get back on its feet. March 2023 is certainly far too soon for this help to be ending.

Rachvince53

Quote from: Westy on February 12, 2023, 05:49:03 PMI realise, we're probably starting to go off topic here, so if it ends up being split, fair enough, but I'd rather see the context kept together for now, but anyway, when was the last major fare increase in the area(The one that happened at the start of the year normally!)?

I'm thinking in the mid 10's.

If we had kept the annual increase, instead of freezing every year since, would we be in this situation, with or without the pandemic to account?

Are we now (excuse the language) 'having our **** handed to us on a plate'?

Sure, it's been nice no major fare increases for the past few years, but surely deep down, we knew this couldn't last forever.

It'll be interesting to see how big the future increase might be.
You are correct. Ignoring the current £2 fares scheme which while handy is more of a gimmick, fares have risen just about everywhere else as far as I know.  Had fares gone up then perhaps companies wouldn't be in the position many find themselves in. As the saying goes, hindsight is a wonderful thing.

Ginger66

It appears Diamond won't be running the following services after this date, 002; 45; 226.

Ginger66

Quote from: Sandy Lane on February 10, 2023, 02:24:14 PMSorry - didn't see it.
Best to close this then?
I didn't see it on here but if there are multiple service changes on this day surely it is better to discuss under the west Midlands general topic.

Image if stagecoach goes for the 45 service from Walsall to West Bromwich 

monkeyjoe


bususer12

#70
I would assume the 226 would go straight to tender as the evening and Sunday part already is so passes TFWM criteria? Maybe hourly though?

Didn't see the benefit of 226 going to Wall Heath, I'm sure the numerous 205 and 15E extensions by NX were requested by locals and not used.

002 has a decent chunk of route where it is the only service so would it be saved too?

2206

#71
Quote from: bususer12 on February 13, 2023, 06:59:35 PM002 has a decent chunk of route where it is the only service
All of it seems to have other services.
Colley Gate all the way through to Howley Grange Road has the 9.
Bartley Green to Halesowen has the 202.
Weoley Castle to Bartley Green has the X21 albeit via Gregory Avenue.
Lyde Green the 18 and the remaing section into Merry Hill the X10.

There only appears to be only 3 odd stops on the whole route where its the only service, which I wouldn't consider to be a decent chunk.

Local Routes
94/95, 11A/11C, 28.

Westy

Quote from: Ginger66 on February 13, 2023, 06:42:07 PMI didn't see it on here but if there are multiple service changes on this day surely it is better to discuss under the west Midlands general topic.

Image if stagecoach goes for the 45 service from Walsall to West Bromwich
If they don't sort out a depot for round here asap, more of what's happening currently will happen!

Ginger66

#73
Quote from: monkeyjoe on February 13, 2023, 06:52:09 PMWonder if stagecoach will take them on  :rolleyes:  :grin:

Stagecoach Midlands
#walsall-Westbrom Due to unforseen circumstances the following service won't be in operation today Monday 17/04/23
45 West Bromwich - Walsall
04:30; 05:10
45Walsall - West Bromwich
05:10;
We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused



Ginger66

Quote from: Westy on February 13, 2023, 07:14:34 PMIf they don't sort out a depot for round here asap, more of what's happening currently will happen!
Didn't Arriva have a satalite depot in the Hill Top area of West Bromwich.

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk