News:

Please do have a browse through the forums or use the Search functionality before posting a new topic - chances are there is already a discussion underway on that subject, or your question has already been answered previously!

Main Menu

4697

Started by YN64AOG, June 24, 2017, 09:15:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Eric Shaw

I thought the main difference was that 4697 has a 6 cylinder engine and the others have the newer 5 cylinder, even though both are approximately 9 litres.

Stevo

And I think I'm right in saying 4697 is Euro 3, as it was the 5 cylinder that was Euro 4/5. So it would have had to be modified to work into the city centre.

MW

Quote from: Stevo on June 25, 2017, 10:16:03 PM
And I think I'm right in saying 4697 is Euro 3, as it was the 5 cylinder that was Euro 4/5. So it would have had to be modified to work into the city centre.

Yeah. A rough indication to what's Euro 4 is that they're 06/56 plate onwards. I think with Volvos for example, B7TLs are Euro 3 and B9TLs are Euro 5 and B5TLs are Euro 6.

Jack

Quote from: Stevo on June 25, 2017, 10:16:03 PM
And I think I'm right in saying 4697 is Euro 3.
Yes. 4697 and 4698 were Euro 3. Anything made in 2006 or before is Euro 3.

Lukeee

Also is 4697 low height or am I just imagining that

John

Quote from: Lukeee on June 26, 2017, 10:35:14 AM
Also is 4697 low height or am I just imagining that

Yes it is. 13 Ft 11 In (I think) as compared to 14 Ft something with 4777-81

Lukeee

Quote from: John on June 26, 2017, 10:43:32 AM
Yes it is. 13 Ft 11 In (I think) as compared to 14 Ft something with 4777-81

Cheers john, thought that was the case

YN64AOG

Quote from: Tony on June 25, 2017, 03:59:57 PM
4697 has been nowhere near East Lancs.

Use the main fleetlist for details, not guesswork. It was bodied at the Scania plant in Poland

But that body was designed by East Lancs coachbuilding.



Just re-done my website.  Check it out to see all my photos.  Updated almost every day!

Stevo

I'm pretty certain it wasn't, as East Lancs had their own body on that chassis - the OmniDekka. I don't think they'd design one for the opposition.

Tony

Quote from: YN63 BYJ on June 27, 2017, 12:18:02 PM
But that body was designed by East Lancs coachbuilding.

Absolutely nothing to do with East Lancs whatsoever

winston


YN64AOG

Quote from: Winston on June 27, 2017, 01:13:55 PM
This is an East Lancs bodied Scania Omnidekka:

Front:
http://www.britishmodelbuses.com/Real_bus_pictures_Large_Images/East%20Lancs%20Omnidekka_Network%20Colchester_O_Large.jpg

Rear:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/scammell_amazon/8595064125

Completely different to NXWM's examples

The front looks the same and the back only has minor changes.  I seem to recall that most of the early N94's (such as 4697) were bodied with EL- designed but Scania-built bodies.



Just re-done my website.  Check it out to see all my photos.  Updated almost every day!

winston

Quote from: YN63 BYJ on June 27, 2017, 02:53:32 PM
The front looks the same and the back only has minor changes.  I seem to recall that most of the early N94's (such as 4697) were bodied with EL- designed but Scania-built bodies.

You recall wrong, accept what numerous people are telling you.

The lower front underneath windcreen / rear bonnet etc come from Scania as part of chassis.

karl724223

Quote from: Winston on June 27, 2017, 03:02:05 PM
You recall wrong, accept what numerous people are telling you.

The lower front underneath windcreen / rear bonnet etc come from Scania as part of chassis.
just tell him to stop posting crap he doesn't know what he's on about  ffs

winston

Quote from: karl724223 on June 27, 2017, 03:39:41 PM
just tell him to stop posting crap he doesn't know what he's on about  ffs

I'll do that when you stop posting the same crap!

Haven't you got a bus to drive......  :P

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk