News:

Welcome to the WM Buses in Photos Forum! New and existing members are kindly reminded to respect and abide by the Forum Rules that are in place here.

Main Menu

Service Changes Jan 2025

Started by EK40, August 29, 2024, 03:39:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ellspurs

Quote from: jasmine on Yesterday at 05:34:39 PMDoes anyone know how the 54 (Hamstead Village to Perry Barr) will work now? it says it will serve scott arms and then go to perry barr, but it already terminates at perry barr on the other end? so is it just a circular now? and if it isnt, why not? it basically already is because scott arms and hamstead village by proxy is really not far from perry barr at all. also will it serve scott arms how the old 46 did (via old walsall road) or will it follow the 16 route (via hamstead road and newton road) into scott arms?

it's just extremely unclear how the 54 will work once it reaches Hamstead Village now, and all plausible ways just seem stupid. if the route were to serve scott arms (we don't even know HOW it will serve it once it hits hamstead village) and then go to perry barr, as the changelog says, it's essentially a circular route, but they've not called it as such at all.
It'll probably just extend via the old 61 route to Great Barr from Hamstead Village, running Great Barr to Perry Barr via Hamstead Village. The notes on the 61 say it's withdrawn from this section and it offers the 54 as an alternative service.

jasmine

#91
Quote from: ellspurs on Yesterday at 05:54:13 PMIt'll probably just extend via the old 61 route to Great Barr from Hamstead Village, running Great Barr to Perry Barr via Hamstead Village. The notes on the 61 say it's withdrawn from this section and it offers the 54 as an alternative service.
Ah you're right, I completely missed the 61's notes, it makes a lot more sense now and it also says 54 Scott Arms to Perry Barr so as you say yeah, it will just go up Old Walsall Road and terminate there, and will not go to Perry Barr or Newton and Hamstead Road.

Old Walsall Road has had too many revisions to it to count on one hand since the 46 was withdrawn, much to the residents of Hamstead's dismay, it's almost like it shouldn't have been taken away in the first place, if even now, 2 years later, the road and replacement services still haven't been established.
16/16A "enjoyer"

Jay71

I thought the 229 had returned to its normal route

fleetline6477

Is it fair to assume tenders, for example Banga's 53, NX evenings 15 / Sundays15A, that were on the list are remaining with the current operator as no changes are currently listed?

2206

A couple of E200s I'm guessing will be surplus and moved onto other routes with NX no longer operating the PN 14/14A/24 CV 2 and WB 54.

Also Diamond will no longer operate into Solihull anymore once these changes take effect.
Local Routes
94/95, 11A/11C, 28.

Stu

Quote from: Jay71 on Yesterday at 07:01:33 PMI thought the 229 had returned to its normal route
Yes it did.

Quote from: fleetline6477 on Yesterday at 07:09:29 PMIs it fair to assume tenders, for example Banga's 53, NX evenings 15 / Sundays15A, that were on the list are remaining with the current operator as no changes are currently listed?

As I mentioned earlier, I'd hold back from making assumptions just yet as I don't believe that TfWM have updated that page fully yet.

Quote from: 2206 on Yesterday at 07:36:08 PMA couple of E200s I'm guessing will be surplus and moved onto other routes with NX no longer operating the PN 14/14A/24 CV 2 and WB 54.

NX have picked up the 22 Bearwood to Oldbury, which I assume would only need short E200s. Will be interesting to see how they work that.
My locals:
2 - Birmingham to Maypole | 3 - Birmingham to Yardley Wood
11A/C - Birmingham Outer Circle | 27 - Yardley Wood to Frankley
76 - Solihull to Northfield | 169 - Solihull to Kings Heath

West Midlands Bus Users: Website | Facebook | X/Twitter | Bluesky

MW

Quote from: fleetline6477 on Yesterday at 07:09:29 PMIs it fair to assume tenders, for example Banga's 53, NX evenings 15 / Sundays15A, that were on the list are remaining with the current operator as no changes are currently listed?


Some tenders haven't been awarded. Some have been merged with others. 

Ingleboro261F

#97
Looks like
Quote from: Coventrybususer95 on Yesterday at 03:21:48 PMhttps://www.tfwm.org.uk/plan-your-journey/ways-to-travel/buses-in-the-west-midlands/upcoming-bus-service-changes/#


Some of the new changes are listed here if anyone is interested
As the A1/A2/A15/A12 are all being run by landflight,wouldn't that mean Landflight are going to have to invest in some more buses as it says they will run every 30 mins?

Stu

Quote from: Ingleboro261F on Yesterday at 08:06:47 PMLooks likeAs the A1/A2/A15/A12 are all being run by landflight,wouldn't that mean Landflight are going to have to invest in some more buses as it says they will run every 30 mins?
All depends on what the new routes and timetables look like. Landflight also lose the A3 which is being withdrawn. Depending on how the services are interworked, might not need any additional buses. But I'm sure this will all have been taken into consideration when bidding on these contracts.


My locals:
2 - Birmingham to Maypole | 3 - Birmingham to Yardley Wood
11A/C - Birmingham Outer Circle | 27 - Yardley Wood to Frankley
76 - Solihull to Northfield | 169 - Solihull to Kings Heath

West Midlands Bus Users: Website | Facebook | X/Twitter | Bluesky

MasterPlan

Are there likely to be non-tender related changes in the new year?
Local Routes: 002, 39/39A, X21, 46, 76.
Localish Routes: 18, 23, X22.

Steve3229vp

Some of these changes are quite interesting, I like the idea of using the 6xx series again, I've always thought that bus services that are 'entirely' subsidised by TfWM should all be in the 6xx series and advertised to that fact if you see a service in the 6xx it means use it or lose it, it would make passengers more aware. I am however struggling with the use of number 188, I don't know where that has come from., it doesn't make much sense

Westy

Surely any service is 'Use it or lose it' irrespective of the number?

wembley86

Quote from: Coventrybususer95 on Yesterday at 03:21:48 PMhttps://www.tfwm.org.uk/plan-your-journey/ways-to-travel/buses-in-the-west-midlands/upcoming-bus-service-changes/#


Some of the new changes are listed here if anyone is interested
Looks like the 41 is going back to how the old 411 was.  Wednesbury to West Bromwich 

Stu

Quote from: Steve3229vp on Today at 05:08:55 AMSome of these changes are quite interesting, I like the idea of using the 6xx series again, I've always thought that bus services that are 'entirely' subsidised by TfWM should all be in the 6xx series and advertised to that fact if you see a service in the 6xx it means use it or lose it, it would make passengers more aware. I am however struggling with the use of number 188, I don't know where that has come from., it doesn't make much sense
It reminds me of when the former 69 service (Brandwood End to Shirley) got 'chopped up' and became what is now the 169 between Kings Heath and Solihull.

The 88 is being revised and extended, thus becomes the 188. When you look at it that way, it sort of makes sense.

I suspect that when the time comes to franchise everything, and the whole network gets revised, we'll see a lot of routes get renumbered. But I don't think it will be done in any 'logical' way, for anyone dreaming of a return to 2xx, 3xx, 4xx etc.
My locals:
2 - Birmingham to Maypole | 3 - Birmingham to Yardley Wood
11A/C - Birmingham Outer Circle | 27 - Yardley Wood to Frankley
76 - Solihull to Northfield | 169 - Solihull to Kings Heath

West Midlands Bus Users: Website | Facebook | X/Twitter | Bluesky

Gareth

Quote from: monkeyjoe on Yesterday at 04:51:44 PMSo ditching the Alpha routes with numerical numbers , wondering if the Acocks green to airport still on the cards?
The constant renumbering of routes does nothing apart from confuse everybody. And since one of the reason for ditching certain groups of numbers was it was easier to remember two digits than three, have people's memories suddenly got better?

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk