6:48 997 from Pheasey has decided to not appear this morning!
Please do have a browse through the forums or use the Search functionality before posting a new topic - chances are there is already a discussion underway on that subject, or your question has already been answered previously!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Bus_user_jay on January 22, 2024, 10:27:46 PMOut of interest, why are B7s never on the 39? Around a year ago though I did see one, even did a double take to make sure it wasn't a 34/37!They aren't allowed because of Bridgeman Street, the curved roofs are too much of a tight call. Hence why I've only see Solo's, B6 and B10's and Omnilinks and E200's go under.
Quote from: West_Brom/WalsallBusGeek on January 22, 2024, 06:16:24 PMFor the 51, shouldn't the ADL Enviro 400 MMC be in the also commonly used section?At this point those and the E400's are the main allocation as there's hardly any or none Hydrogens!
Quote from: hlliwmai on January 22, 2024, 10:17:36 AMSo, it's STILL happening then...on the basis of this there is no way that Chaserider will revert the 19 back to it's original timetable, I hope at some point Chaserider decide they are pulling off the route altogether and I hope that no other operator wants to take it on and the route is scrapped indefinitelyIt's up to TfWM if they want the route to be continue to be operated.
Quote from: Stu on January 20, 2024, 05:17:28 PMAccording to the VRM lookup we use at work, this only meets Euro4 standards, so wouldn't normally be used on the TfWM contracts.Surely using a Euro 4 bus is better than no bus service at all?
I notice that Stagecoach recently are back to their old form of cancelling journeys again, presumably this is being used today due to a shortage of Euro6 compliant vehicles.
If Stagecoach want to be taken seriously by TfWM then they need to show some commitment by investing in a local site and some decent vehicles.
Quote from: 2900 on January 18, 2024, 03:07:44 PMDudley stops err what can one say other than complete shambles imo, they TFWM have had years to sort this out properly how did they think they could operate an entire bus station of routes on 2 streets its a joke.100% agree.
Today i,m glad traffic ate up my all my dropback/layover time resulting in straight in and out there sharpish
Quote from: karl724223 on January 16, 2024, 03:21:11 PMHave you actually been down there watching buses or just moaning from looking at a piece of paperYes I was there myself watching, I wasn't the only one who thought the same either. Waiting for a 87 that ended up arriving half an hour late.
Only it's day three of operation and I've not heard of any problems yet just you on here
Quote from: Stu on January 16, 2024, 11:40:16 AMI would assume that stop is reserved for unloading only.Does it require a shelter for Unload Only? Waste of money a Pole Stop would have made sense. To have an empty unused shelter sitting there when there's about 3/4 in the surrounding area overflowing makes no sense.
Quote from: Lukeee on January 16, 2024, 12:43:00 PMThe 5 bus stop at the King's Road in kingstanding (near the junction with finchley Road) used to have a shelter and now just a pole. Not sure of the reason why but could be down to antisocial behaviour as groups of kids would hang around in the bus stops on the evenings.Both sides had there shelter removed because of the ASB that happens there.
Quote from: West_Brom/WalsallBusGeek on January 15, 2024, 09:43:38 PMDoes this mean WB's 45** will be gone in the next few weeks?Considering they've working on 4514 I assume they'll be here for slightly more than a few weeks...
Quote from: TT90 on January 15, 2024, 09:58:37 PM5 Services are using DY4 in Tower Street. 8/X8, 2, 2A, 81 and 82. Yet the 1 has it's own stop on DY5 ?Makes so much sense doesn't it.