Reminder to all members: please keep thread discussions 'on-topic' - this is a structured discussion forum, not a general 'group chat'!
Quote from: Ronnoc on Yesterday at 07:21:53 PMI pretty much agree with everything apart from this bit. Enhancing active travel does play a big part in reducing congestion if done correctly. A lot of car journeys that people take can usually be done via means of walking or cycling. The road system here is extremely hostile to cycling, we don't have to look very far to see the benefits of good cycling infrastructure (Paris, London, Netherlands). Bus lanes and cycle lanes please.I'm not averse to 'active travel', I just said there was 'too much focus', that's all.
Quote from: Stu on Yesterday at 07:02:17 PMThere's too much focus (and money being spent) on 'active travel' and cycle lanes;
Quote from: Ronnoc on Yesterday at 04:17:38 PMFranchising is a very very small piece of the puzzle in terms of transport improvements.As I have said many times before, franchising won't magically make bus services punctual and reliable overnight, you'll still have the same issues. What needs to be looked at is the 'infrastructure'. More bus lanes, and more bus priority measures, such as 'smart' traffic light signals that alter traffic flows to allow buses through quicker.
Quote from: ntw456 on May 15, 2024, 11:30:29 PMGuessing this was the one that collided with the pub in Burntwood?It still amazes me how you can hit a stationery object when you're completely fit to drive